Archives
Archives
| From: | Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Why RAID1? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:59:22 | ||
| Message-Id: | 01BD9321-DB70-4BED-83C8-78DCF72483E0@stellar.eclipse.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Why RAID1? by KH |
||
| 1 | On 17 Dec 2008, at 10:25, KH wrote: |
| 2 | > ... |
| 3 | > Also there have been articles that if one drive of a raid dies there |
| 4 | > is |
| 5 | > a chance that you cannot recover your data. This is based on the |
| 6 | > theory, |
| 7 | > that one of the other drives have hidden errors. The chances for this |
| 8 | > grow with the size of the hd. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | [Citation Needed] |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Why RAID1? | Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Why RAID1? | KH <gentoo-user@××××××××××××××××.de> |