Archives
Archives
| From: | KH <gentoo-user@××××××××××××××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Why RAID1? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:44:56 | ||
| Message-Id: | 494A37B5.4000806@konstantinhansen.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Why RAID1? by Stroller |
||
| 1 | Stroller schrieb: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > On 17 Dec 2008, at 10:25, KH wrote: |
| 4 | >> ... |
| 5 | >> Also there have been articles that if one drive of a raid dies there is |
| 6 | >> a chance that you cannot recover your data. This is based on the theory, |
| 7 | >> that one of the other drives have hidden errors. The chances for this |
| 8 | >> grow with the size of the hd. |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > [Citation Needed] |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/10/21/2126252&from=rss |
| 15 | http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=162 |
| 16 | |
| 17 | kh |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Why RAID1? | Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> |