Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: John Covici <covici@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] how to prevent portage from installing masked package
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2018 04:22:51
Message-Id: m3murqpes9.wl-covici@ccs.covici.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] how to prevent portage from installing masked package by Paul Colquhoun
1 On Sat, 06 Oct 2018 20:39:42 -0400,
2 Paul Colquhoun wrote:
3 >
4 > On Sunday, 7 October 2018 8:34:39 AM AEDT Jack wrote:
5 > > On 2018.10.06 16:29, John Covici wrote:
6 > > > On Sat, 06 Oct 2018 14:55:53 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
7 > > > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 2:04 PM John Covici <covici@××××××××××.com>
8 > > >
9 > > > wrote:
10 > > >>> So, I have not been able to figure this out, it did not abort and
11 > > >>> wants to install the masked package, so hear is the whole output
12 > > >>> --- thanks for all your help.
13 > > >>
14 > > >> What is the actual package.mask set to? Does the same mask cover
15 > > >> both the installed and upgraded version of gtk+? It seems odd to me
16 > > >> that emerge would even offer the option to continue if a package was
17 > > >> masked. You might want to check with the portage team.
18 > > >
19 > > > The line in my /etc/portage/package.mask says
20 > > > x11-libs/gtk+-3.22.30
21 > >
22 > > For a specific version, you probably want that to be
23 > > =x11-libs/gtk+-3.22.30
24 > > or
25 > >
26 > > >=x11-libs/gtk+-3.22.30
27 > >
28 > > although the # in
29 > > [ebuild U #] x11-libs/gtk+-3.24.1:3::mv [3.22.30:3::gentoo]
30 > > seems to show it knows it is listed in package.mask.
31 >
32 >
33 > Apart from the package.mask syntax error, there is also an emerge flag you
34 > might want to try:
35 >
36 > --autounmask-keep-masks y
37 >
38 > I added this when emerge kept asking me to unmask stuff I had manually masked.
39
40 Thanks for the tip, I never heard of that one.
41
42 --
43 Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
44 How do
45 you spend it?
46
47 John Covici wb2una
48 covici@××××××××××.com