1 |
On Sat, 06 Oct 2018 20:39:42 -0400, |
2 |
Paul Colquhoun wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Sunday, 7 October 2018 8:34:39 AM AEDT Jack wrote: |
5 |
> > On 2018.10.06 16:29, John Covici wrote: |
6 |
> > > On Sat, 06 Oct 2018 14:55:53 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
7 |
> > > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 2:04 PM John Covici <covici@××××××××××.com> |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > wrote: |
10 |
> > >>> So, I have not been able to figure this out, it did not abort and |
11 |
> > >>> wants to install the masked package, so hear is the whole output |
12 |
> > >>> --- thanks for all your help. |
13 |
> > >> |
14 |
> > >> What is the actual package.mask set to? Does the same mask cover |
15 |
> > >> both the installed and upgraded version of gtk+? It seems odd to me |
16 |
> > >> that emerge would even offer the option to continue if a package was |
17 |
> > >> masked. You might want to check with the portage team. |
18 |
> > > |
19 |
> > > The line in my /etc/portage/package.mask says |
20 |
> > > x11-libs/gtk+-3.22.30 |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > For a specific version, you probably want that to be |
23 |
> > =x11-libs/gtk+-3.22.30 |
24 |
> > or |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > >=x11-libs/gtk+-3.22.30 |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > although the # in |
29 |
> > [ebuild U #] x11-libs/gtk+-3.24.1:3::mv [3.22.30:3::gentoo] |
30 |
> > seems to show it knows it is listed in package.mask. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Apart from the package.mask syntax error, there is also an emerge flag you |
34 |
> might want to try: |
35 |
> |
36 |
> --autounmask-keep-masks y |
37 |
> |
38 |
> I added this when emerge kept asking me to unmask stuff I had manually masked. |
39 |
|
40 |
Thanks for the tip, I never heard of that one. |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
44 |
How do |
45 |
you spend it? |
46 |
|
47 |
John Covici wb2una |
48 |
covici@××××××××××.com |