| 1 |
On Sunday, 7 October 2018 8:34:39 AM AEDT Jack wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2018.10.06 16:29, John Covici wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sat, 06 Oct 2018 14:55:53 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 2:04 PM John Covici <covici@××××××××××.com> |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > wrote: |
| 7 |
> >>> So, I have not been able to figure this out, it did not abort and |
| 8 |
> >>> wants to install the masked package, so hear is the whole output |
| 9 |
> >>> --- thanks for all your help. |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> What is the actual package.mask set to? Does the same mask cover |
| 12 |
> >> both the installed and upgraded version of gtk+? It seems odd to me |
| 13 |
> >> that emerge would even offer the option to continue if a package was |
| 14 |
> >> masked. You might want to check with the portage team. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > The line in my /etc/portage/package.mask says |
| 17 |
> > x11-libs/gtk+-3.22.30 |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> For a specific version, you probably want that to be |
| 20 |
> =x11-libs/gtk+-3.22.30 |
| 21 |
> or |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> >=x11-libs/gtk+-3.22.30 |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> although the # in |
| 26 |
> [ebuild U #] x11-libs/gtk+-3.24.1:3::mv [3.22.30:3::gentoo] |
| 27 |
> seems to show it knows it is listed in package.mask. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Apart from the package.mask syntax error, there is also an emerge flag you |
| 31 |
might want to try: |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
--autounmask-keep-masks y |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I added this when emerge kept asking me to unmask stuff I had manually masked. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Reverend Paul Colquhoun, ULC. http://andor.dropbear.id.au/ |
| 40 |
Asking for technical help in newsgroups? Read this first: |
| 41 |
http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#intro |
Archives