1 |
On 2018.10.06 16:29, John Covici wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 06 Oct 2018 14:55:53 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 2:04 PM John Covici <covici@××××××××××.com> |
4 |
> wrote: |
5 |
>>> So, I have not been able to figure this out, it did not abort and |
6 |
>>> wants to install the masked package, so hear is the whole output |
7 |
>>> --- thanks for all your help. |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
>> What is the actual package.mask set to? Does the same mask cover |
10 |
>> both the installed and upgraded version of gtk+? It seems odd to me |
11 |
>> that emerge would even offer the option to continue if a package was |
12 |
>> masked. You might want to check with the portage team. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> The line in my /etc/portage/package.mask says |
15 |
> x11-libs/gtk+-3.22.30 |
16 |
|
17 |
For a specific version, you probably want that to be |
18 |
=x11-libs/gtk+-3.22.30 |
19 |
or |
20 |
>=x11-libs/gtk+-3.22.30 |
21 |
|
22 |
although the # in |
23 |
[ebuild U #] x11-libs/gtk+-3.24.1:3::mv [3.22.30:3::gentoo] |
24 |
seems to show it knows it is listed in package.mask. |
25 |
|
26 |
Jack |