| 1 |
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 05:07:25PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> NAT behind a home router is bad, too. For IPv4, it's only necessary |
| 4 |
> because there aren't enough IPv4 addresses to let everyone have a unique |
| 5 |
> one. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
The best real reason for moving to IPV6 is address space (or lack |
| 8 |
thereof, in the case of IPV4). The people who are truly interested in |
| 9 |
speeding up IPV6 adoption should do their best to shut up the internet |
| 10 |
hippies who constantly rant and rave about how "NAT is evil". Don't let |
| 11 |
the cause get distracted by that unrelated issue. Focus on the core |
| 12 |
issue. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
| 16 |
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |
Archives