Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Daniel Pielmeier <daniel.pielmeier@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: baselayout-2.0.0 surprises
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:55:36
Message-Id: 4807AB35.5060408@googlemail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: baselayout-2.0.0 surprises by Michael Schmarck
1 Michael Schmarck schrieb:
2 > · Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>:
3 >
4 >> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:23:18 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
5 >>
6 >>>> Because you didn't read the elog messages.
7 >>> it is still not ok to remove /etc/conf.d/net. That is extremly stupid.
8 >> It would be, but it wasn't removed on any of the three machines I
9 >> upgraded.
10 >
11 > Armin has at least one machine and I've got 2 were this happened and
12 > there are reports in the forum discussion thread reg. disappearance
13 > of /etc/conf.d/net (or rather, that it was replaced with a
14 > basically blank default file).
15 >
16 > So, I think, that your system is a bit odd.
17 >
18 > Michael Schmarck
19
20
21 http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/baselayout/baselayout-2.0.0.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3
22 --
23 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: baselayout-2.0.0 surprises Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>