1 |
Hi Hemmann, |
2 |
|
3 |
well, I don't have a good reason to use initrd, but this is an |
4 |
attempt to try putting gentoo running on my server. I'll kick out ufs |
5 |
but I don't think that this is the problem. |
6 |
Yes, before try to use initrd I put everthing I need *built in* but |
7 |
didn't work. Any other clue? |
8 |
|
9 |
Thanks, |
10 |
|
11 |
Leandro. |
12 |
|
13 |
2006/5/21, Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>: |
14 |
> On Sunday 21 May 2006 04:31, Leandro Melo de Sales wrote: |
15 |
> > Ok... now I'm stuck here: |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > ramdisk compressed image found at block |
18 |
> > ufs: was compiled with read-only support, can't be mounted as read-write |
19 |
> > udf-fs: no particition found (1) |
20 |
> > xfs: bad magic number |
21 |
> > xfs: sb validate failed |
22 |
> > kernel panic - not synching: vfs: unable to mount root fs on unknown |
23 |
> > block (8,18) |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> is there any GOOD reason for using an initrd? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Really? I can't imagine any. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Second, what is this ufs stuff? This is linux. Kick out ufs, make the |
32 |
> partitions linux, with ext3 or reiserfs or xfs or jfs. Make a udf, iso9660 |
33 |
> and fat module, and don't build the other fs (except sysfs,proc etc). |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Build everything needed to boot INTO the kernel. Again, what are the |
36 |
> advantages of a initrd? Except that it is another instance in boot that costs |
37 |
> time and may be introduce a cause of failure? |
38 |
> -- |
39 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
40 |
> |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Leandro Melo de Sales. |
46 |
Computer Science Student |
47 |
Laboratório de Sistemas Distribuídos - www.lsd.ufcg.edu.br |
48 |
Laboratório de Sistemas Embarcados e Computação Pervasiva - |
49 |
www.embeddedacademy.org |
50 |
Universidade Federal de Campina Grande - UFCG |
51 |
Campina Grande - PB - Brasil |
52 |
|
53 |
-- |
54 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |