| 1 |
On Sunday 21 May 2006 04:31, Leandro Melo de Sales wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ok... now I'm stuck here: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> ramdisk compressed image found at block |
| 5 |
> ufs: was compiled with read-only support, can't be mounted as read-write |
| 6 |
> udf-fs: no particition found (1) |
| 7 |
> xfs: bad magic number |
| 8 |
> xfs: sb validate failed |
| 9 |
> kernel panic - not synching: vfs: unable to mount root fs on unknown |
| 10 |
> block (8,18) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
is there any GOOD reason for using an initrd? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Really? I can't imagine any. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Second, what is this ufs stuff? This is linux. Kick out ufs, make the |
| 19 |
partitions linux, with ext3 or reiserfs or xfs or jfs. Make a udf, iso9660 |
| 20 |
and fat module, and don't build the other fs (except sysfs,proc etc). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Build everything needed to boot INTO the kernel. Again, what are the |
| 23 |
advantages of a initrd? Except that it is another instance in boot that costs |
| 24 |
time and may be introduce a cause of failure? |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives