Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Qt5 - should I worry?
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 11:12:42
Message-Id: 9368873.JPfCuOGxN7@wstn
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Qt5 - should I worry? by lee
1 On Friday 01 January 2016 11:33:32 lee wrote:
2 > Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> writes:
3 > > I won't list all my objections here, but I have attached two screen
4 > > shots of KMail: one in the standard qt4 KDE environment and the other
5 > > in qt5. You can see how much less compact the qt5 version is, even
6 > > after I've fiddled at some length with fonts and qt tweaks, including
7 > > installing the noto fonts which you see here. And the qt5 screen shot
8 > > is half as big again as the qt4.
9 > >
10 > > My question to the panel is: is this just a temporary stage of
11 > > development, or are we going to have to live with it down the years?
12 >
13 > What you have there is, overall, like 85% (unnecessary) GUI and 15% the
14 > content you're trying to see.
15 >
16 > You don't need to live with that. You could use fvwm or i3 and gnus or
17 > mutt or seamonkey, for example.
18
19 I've tried other DEs and I still prefer KDE. And KMail is the best MUA I've
20 found for POP3, which I intend to stick with.
21
22 --
23 Rgds
24 Peter