| 1 |
Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I won't list all my objections here, but I have attached two screen shots of |
| 4 |
> KMail: one in the standard qt4 KDE environment and the other in qt5. You can |
| 5 |
> see how much less compact the qt5 version is, even after I've fiddled at some |
| 6 |
> length with fonts and qt tweaks, including installing the noto fonts which |
| 7 |
> you see here. And the qt5 screen shot is half as big again as the qt4. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> My question to the panel is: is this just a temporary stage of development, |
| 10 |
> or are we going to have to live with it down the years? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
What you have there is, overall, like 85% (unnecessary) GUI and 15% the |
| 13 |
content you're trying to see. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
You don't need to live with that. You could use fvwm or i3 and gnus or |
| 16 |
mutt or seamonkey, for example. |
Archives