| 1 |
On Monday 30 November 2009 22:48:22 daid kahl wrote: |
| 2 |
> Success on compiling OOo! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'm quite certain it was the ebuild, and that making it use the |
| 5 |
> internal redland and not the system redland was the issue in my case. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> However, I've undone my changes in the ebuild and began compiling |
| 8 |
> again so that I can confirm it fails with only that change. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I had also rebuilt redland, but as I told OOo not to use the system |
| 11 |
> redland, that's why I'm checking again with the default ebuild. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Presuming my guess here is correct, then I need to make a bugzilla |
| 14 |
> post on the matter. That's probably true anyway since I got the |
| 15 |
> message: |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> * QA Notice: |
| 18 |
> * Package openoffice is breaking /usr/share/config permissions. |
| 19 |
> * Please report this issue to gentoo bugzilla. |
| 20 |
> * Permissions will get adjusted automatically now. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
That's a known issue - it saw a reference to it on b.g.o. last night. That bug |
| 24 |
report declared it to be a kde integration error. Logic tells me any number of |
| 25 |
faulty things could do it too). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I'm sure the OOo maintainer will appreciate the detailed bug report you are |
| 28 |
now in a position to give :-) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives