Archives
Archives
| From: | Kerin Millar <kerframil@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: iptables - do I need the nat table? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 11 Apr 2010 02:28:05 | ||
| Message-Id: | hprc1l$30v$2@dough.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] iptables - do I need the nat table? by Tanstaafl |
||
| 1 | On 10/04/2010 23:17, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 2 | > Hello, |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > This is on a server box, and I am *not* doing NAT on it... |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > Do I even need the nat table? If not, I'd like to build the kernel |
| 7 | > without NAT support, but if there's a good reason not to do that, I won't... |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | |
| 10 | If you will not be populating the nat table, you are free to build the |
| 11 | kernel without CONFIG_NF_NAT and its associated options. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Cheers, |
| 14 | |
| 15 | --Kerin |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: iptables - do I need the nat table? | Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> |