| 1 |
On 2010-04-10 10:26 PM, Kerin Millar wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/04/2010 23:17, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 3 |
>> This is on a server box, and I am *not* doing NAT on it... |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Do I even need the nat table? If not, I'd like to build the kernel |
| 6 |
>> without NAT support, but if there's a good reason not to do that, I |
| 7 |
>> won't... |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> If you will not be populating the nat table, you are free to build the |
| 10 |
> kernel without CONFIG_NF_NAT and its associated options. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Thanks Kerin... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Same question then for the raw table... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I'm a bit clueless when it comes to firewalls, and have no idea what |
| 17 |
these numbers mean/do: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
*raw |
| 20 |
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [4911:886011] |
| 21 |
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [4546:2818732] |
| 22 |
COMMIT |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Charles |
Archives