Archives
Archives
| From: | Graham Murray <graham@×××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: iptables - do I need the nat table? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:05:47 | ||
| Message-Id: | 87wrwe2kib.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: iptables - do I need the nat table? by Tanstaafl |
||
| 1 | Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > I'm a bit clueless when it comes to firewalls, and have no idea what |
| 4 | > these numbers mean/do: |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > *raw |
| 7 | > :PREROUTING ACCEPT [4911:886011] |
| 8 | > :OUTPUT ACCEPT [4546:2818732] |
| 9 | > COMMIT |
| 10 | |
| 11 | The numbers are [packets:bytes] which match the rule or table |
| 12 | concerned. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: iptables - do I need the nat table? | Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> |