| 1 |
On Dec 6, 2011 7:58 AM, "Michael Orlitzky" <michael@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 12/05/2011 07:45 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> > |
| 7 |
>> > I've looked up each of those parameters and they sound fine to me. |
| 8 |
>> > How long have you been running them? Have you been notified of any |
| 9 |
>> > mistakenly rejected mail? It's very important my server doesn't miss |
| 10 |
>> > any mail, even if it means dealing with more spam. |
| 11 |
>> > |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Similar situation with me. Because my company is in the financial |
| 14 |
>> sector, false negatives are much more preferred than false positives. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I have never had a false positive report that I traced back to one of the |
| 18 |
postscreen deep protocol tests. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> That being said, they've only been in place for ~4 months. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Four months without a false positive? Good enough for me. Where do I sign? |
| 24 |
:-) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Rgds, |
Archives