| 1 |
On 12/05/2011 07:45 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > I've looked up each of those parameters and they sound fine to me. |
| 5 |
> > How long have you been running them? Have you been notified of any |
| 6 |
> > mistakenly rejected mail? It's very important my server doesn't miss |
| 7 |
> > any mail, even if it means dealing with more spam. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Similar situation with me. Because my company is in the financial |
| 11 |
> sector, false negatives are much more preferred than false positives. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I have never had a false positive report that I traced back to one of |
| 15 |
the postscreen deep protocol tests. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That being said, they've only been in place for ~4 months. |
Archives