Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Ian Zimmerman <itz@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Argh, palemoon again ** 3 [Was: GCC 5.4.0]
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:51:34
Message-Id: 20170425044442.29252.2411F380@matica.foolinux.mooo.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Argh, palemoon again ** 3 [Was: GCC 5.4.0] by Bill Kenworthy
1 On 2017-04-25 08:17, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
2
3 > built by portage after commenting out the "die" in the palemoon-1.eclass
4 > file.
5 >
6 > rattus ~ # ldd `which palemoon` | grep -F libstdc++
7 > libstdc++.so.6 =>
8 > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.4.0/libstdc++.so.6 (0x0000003ae0a00000)
9 > rattus ~ #
10
11 And it worked here, too. Afterwards I visited html5test.com with
12 palemoon and it works, getting a score 378/555. (This may be lowballed
13 because I kept on ABP and Request Policy.)
14
15 So, I think that error in the ebuild really should be retired.
16
17 BTW, the revdep-rebuild took about 6 hours for 94 packages, on my fairly
18 beefy desktop. I await the results on the slimmer laptop with some
19 trepidation :-P
20
21 --
22 Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups
23 Personal signed mail: please _encrypt_ and sign
24 Don't clear-text sign:
25 http://primate.net/~itz/blog/the-problem-with-gpg-signatures.html

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Argh, palemoon again ** 3 [Was: GCC 5.4.0] Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>