Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Argh, palemoon again ** 3 [Was: GCC 5.4.0]
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:06:35
Message-Id: 20170425140608.GA30825@waltdnes.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Argh, palemoon again ** 3 [Was: GCC 5.4.0] by Ian Zimmerman
1 On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 09:51:18PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote
2 > On 2017-04-25 08:17, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
3 >
4 > > built by portage after commenting out the "die" in the palemoon-1.eclass
5 > > file.
6 > >
7 > > rattus ~ # ldd `which palemoon` | grep -F libstdc++
8 > > libstdc++.so.6 =>
9 > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.4.0/libstdc++.so.6 (0x0000003ae0a00000)
10 > > rattus ~ #
11
12 After rebuilding Pale Moon with gcc-5.4.0, please check
13 "about:buildconfig", specifically CXXFLAGS. Do you get 0 or 1 for
14 -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI
15
16 > And it worked here, too. Afterwards I visited html5test.com with
17 > palemoon and it works, getting a score 378/555. (This may be lowballed
18 > because I kept on ABP and Request Policy.)
19
20 It seems to work on my hot backup, too. I played some Youtube with no
21 problems. By the way, how many blue boxes, out of 6, do you get at
22 https://www.youtube.com/html5
23
24 > BTW, the revdep-rebuild took about 6 hours for 94 packages, on my fairly
25 > beefy desktop. I await the results on the slimmer laptop with some
26 > trepidation :-P
27
28 I had 31 packages in approx 2.5 hours. I chickened out, and will not
29 be doing "emerge -e world".
30
31 --
32 Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>
33 I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: Argh, palemoon again ** 3 [Was: GCC 5.4.0] Ian Zimmerman <itz@×××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Argh, palemoon again ** 3 [Was: GCC 5.4.0] Bill Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au>