1 |
On Wednesday 18 Mar 2015 03:53:57 Fernando Rodriguez wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 4:49:54 PM walt wrote: |
3 |
> > I get a certificate verification error when visiting https://www.att.com |
4 |
> > using firefox-36.0, but not when using chrome-41.0.2272.76. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Anyone else see the same with firefox-36? |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > BTW, I tried the latest firefox in a Win7 virtual machine and I was |
9 |
> > shocked to see that firefox was updating itself when I was logged in |
10 |
> > as an unprivileged user (i.e. *not* an Administrator). Are the idiots |
11 |
> > at M$ *really* that stupid? They've learned nothing, apparently, since |
12 |
> > Win 95 :( |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > BTW, the Win7 firefox also flagged an error when visiting the web site |
15 |
> > I mentioned above, but the error was displayed so subtly that I would |
16 |
> > have missed it if I hadn't been looking for it specifically. Very bad |
17 |
> > behavior. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Technically the issue is with att's SSL certificate. It may be that they |
20 |
> got a cheap certificate (meaning it's provides encryption but the CA did |
21 |
> not verificy that ATT is a legit company) or it may be an issue with the |
22 |
> certificate. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> It doesn't give any warning for me, it just shows an exclamation next to |
25 |
> the address and the latest chromium does the same (it shows a triangle) |
26 |
> and it gives you more info: "The identity of this website has been |
27 |
> verified by Verizon Akamai SureSever CA G14-SHA1 but does not have public |
28 |
> audit records." |
29 |
> |
30 |
> If you're concerned about it contact AT&T and let them know. |
31 |
|
32 |
I also don't see a (pop-up) warning on Firefox 31.5.0 and Chromium |
33 |
41.0.2272.76, but both browsers complain for two things by means of |
34 |
exclamation marks in their address bar: |
35 |
|
36 |
1. Some components on the page (pictures) are not secure. It is common |
37 |
practice to load pictures from a picture library on a different server to |
38 |
where the main web page content is served, but they should secure all content |
39 |
with the same keys to avoid confusion. |
40 |
|
41 |
2. The lack of Audit records for the wildcard certificate the site is using. |
42 |
This is a new security check and relates to certificate transparency, which |
43 |
aims to protect us from rogue or compromised CAs: |
44 |
|
45 |
http://www.certificate-transparency.org/what-is-ct |
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
Regards, |
50 |
Mick |