Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:41:34
Message-Id: 49bf44f10712141835l89c714dr5e80b13b721b1b87@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules by Christopher Dale
1 > >>>> Lately I've been shopping around for other distros as well as looking
2 > >>>> at *BSD. Gentoo development seems to have slowed way down and I like
3 > >>>> things being improved as quickly as possible. FreeBSD is supposed to
4 > >>>> be the closest relation, but even that won't do. I don't think there
5 > >>>> is anything as satisfying as Gentoo out there. The concept is second
6 > >>>> to none, the execution of that concept is fantastic, but it needs to
7 > >>>> keep moving forward. What is the next step? Or should we keep
8 > >>>> treading water?
9 > >>>>
10 > >>> Is this a continuation?
11 > >>> http://groups.google.de/group/linux.gentoo.user/browse_thread/thread/cc31581cbfa4d0e2/a0b4a5d52f0bc112
12 > >>>
13 > >> Yeah, it's me again.
14 > >>
15 > >>
16 > >
17 > > I have a pretty small desktop system syncing weekly, and 2 others
18 > > syncing from it. Every week I see upgrades in many packages, from
19 > > system to desktop applications. I have 3 stable systems, with
20 > > different roles (a server, a workstation and one in "dumb terminal
21 > > with a web browser" mode), and they're completing 2 years of constant,
22 > > careful and flawless upgrades.
23 > >
24 > > You don't need statistics, or reports, or whatever. This list is the
25 > > living proof of Gentoo existence and the constant flow of information
26 > > regarding it. Another good point is that BGO (bugs.gentoo.org) is also
27 > > active, so, development is constant.
28 > >
29 > > I don't wanna sound rude, but this discussion is almost the same as
30 > > that one, as unproductive and "starving for attention" too (but with a
31 > > nice title), and this is the third edition. Don't get me wrong, but
32 > > what exactly is the point of starting this threads? If you're worried
33 > > about Gentoo slowing down or even dying, don't be, Gentoo is alive and
34 > > kicking.
35 > >
36 > >
37 > I would agree Daniel,
38 >
39 > There is always stuff rollin' in from all the gentoo lists... It's
40 > almost ridiculous how many discussions and threads are going on in
41 > there. In that respect, I completely agree that the Gentoo project is
42 > far from idle. For another snapshot of just how active gentoo is, check
43 > out the IRC channels (#gentoo) and as Daniel said, bugs.gentoo.org.
44 >
45 > "Don't get me wrong, but what exactly is the point of starting this
46 > threads? If you're worried about Gentoo slowing down or even dying,
47 > don't be, Gentoo is alive and kicking." - Daniel
48 >
49 > It's true :)
50 >
51 > Feel free to post any ideas you have to enhance Gentoo's base
52 > functionality to the list though, I think you've roused everyone's
53 > curiosity Grant :D
54
55 My ideas aren't really important unless they're everyone else's ideas
56 too. I'm sure a lot of us would like to see the same kind of stuff
57 happen. The weird thing is, none of it is happening. This must be
58 due to a lack of devs or dev interest right? I can't understand that.
59 Gentoo should be just getting started at this point, and yet people
60 seem to think it's finished. Sooner or later other distros will
61 accomplish things that make Gentoo seem inferior. Ease of use is a
62 good example, but it's just an example. Advancements will continue
63 and Gentoo will be left in the dust if it doesn't advance also.
64
65 - Grant
66 --
67 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules "Bo Ørsted Andresen" <bo.andresen@××××.dk>
Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules Christopher Dale <chrisd@××××××××××.org>