1 |
> >>>> Lately I've been shopping around for other distros as well as looking |
2 |
> >>>> at *BSD. Gentoo development seems to have slowed way down and I like |
3 |
> >>>> things being improved as quickly as possible. FreeBSD is supposed to |
4 |
> >>>> be the closest relation, but even that won't do. I don't think there |
5 |
> >>>> is anything as satisfying as Gentoo out there. The concept is second |
6 |
> >>>> to none, the execution of that concept is fantastic, but it needs to |
7 |
> >>>> keep moving forward. What is the next step? Or should we keep |
8 |
> >>>> treading water? |
9 |
> >>>> |
10 |
> >>> Is this a continuation? |
11 |
> >>> http://groups.google.de/group/linux.gentoo.user/browse_thread/thread/cc31581cbfa4d0e2/a0b4a5d52f0bc112 |
12 |
> >>> |
13 |
> >> Yeah, it's me again. |
14 |
> >> |
15 |
> >> |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > I have a pretty small desktop system syncing weekly, and 2 others |
18 |
> > syncing from it. Every week I see upgrades in many packages, from |
19 |
> > system to desktop applications. I have 3 stable systems, with |
20 |
> > different roles (a server, a workstation and one in "dumb terminal |
21 |
> > with a web browser" mode), and they're completing 2 years of constant, |
22 |
> > careful and flawless upgrades. |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > You don't need statistics, or reports, or whatever. This list is the |
25 |
> > living proof of Gentoo existence and the constant flow of information |
26 |
> > regarding it. Another good point is that BGO (bugs.gentoo.org) is also |
27 |
> > active, so, development is constant. |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > I don't wanna sound rude, but this discussion is almost the same as |
30 |
> > that one, as unproductive and "starving for attention" too (but with a |
31 |
> > nice title), and this is the third edition. Don't get me wrong, but |
32 |
> > what exactly is the point of starting this threads? If you're worried |
33 |
> > about Gentoo slowing down or even dying, don't be, Gentoo is alive and |
34 |
> > kicking. |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> I would agree Daniel, |
38 |
> |
39 |
> There is always stuff rollin' in from all the gentoo lists... It's |
40 |
> almost ridiculous how many discussions and threads are going on in |
41 |
> there. In that respect, I completely agree that the Gentoo project is |
42 |
> far from idle. For another snapshot of just how active gentoo is, check |
43 |
> out the IRC channels (#gentoo) and as Daniel said, bugs.gentoo.org. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> "Don't get me wrong, but what exactly is the point of starting this |
46 |
> threads? If you're worried about Gentoo slowing down or even dying, |
47 |
> don't be, Gentoo is alive and kicking." - Daniel |
48 |
> |
49 |
> It's true :) |
50 |
> |
51 |
> Feel free to post any ideas you have to enhance Gentoo's base |
52 |
> functionality to the list though, I think you've roused everyone's |
53 |
> curiosity Grant :D |
54 |
|
55 |
My ideas aren't really important unless they're everyone else's ideas |
56 |
too. I'm sure a lot of us would like to see the same kind of stuff |
57 |
happen. The weird thing is, none of it is happening. This must be |
58 |
due to a lack of devs or dev interest right? I can't understand that. |
59 |
Gentoo should be just getting started at this point, and yet people |
60 |
seem to think it's finished. Sooner or later other distros will |
61 |
accomplish things that make Gentoo seem inferior. Ease of use is a |
62 |
good example, but it's just an example. Advancements will continue |
63 |
and Gentoo will be left in the dust if it doesn't advance also. |
64 |
|
65 |
- Grant |
66 |
-- |
67 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |