| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 22:25:53
|
| 5 |
Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com> napisał(a):
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:16 PM wkuz@××.pl <wkuz@××.pl> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > If non-free software is not of any concern for you, then maybe try |
| 10 |
> > Vivaldi browser? It is based on the same engine and feels quite like |
| 11 |
> > chromium but with many many more options (USE=widevine for netflix |
| 12 |
> > ;) ) |
| 13 |
> I have no concerns regarding licensing et al., but I once tried |
| 14 |
> Vivaldi and was not impressed (I don't remember why). I'm into chrom* |
| 15 |
> only because it provides a smooth experience re youtube & gmail. I |
| 16 |
> don't think other browsers can do it, but I wouldn't mind being wrong. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> BTW: chromium also has a "widevine" flag. I don't know how much time |
| 19 |
> does it take to compile chromium nowadays, but I don't have netflix |
| 20 |
> anyway :( |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Maybe take a look here:
|
| 24 |
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/List_of_applications#Web_browsers
|
| 25 |
Not all of them have ebuilds, but most of them do.
|
| 26 |
I hope you'll find something that suits your needs :)
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
- --
|
| 29 |
xWK
|
| 30 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
iHUEAREIAB0WIQTD0rOlRXTVQVPxHd4dqSXVhOqGqwUCYpPmewAKCRAdqSXVhOqG
|
| 33 |
q+PrAP4zdUkrvXW0DFDKt1BphdOFnr5Qld9n35JfC8FauGAfFQD9F6EhhhoU60/N
|
| 34 |
Rur1v+alb5408KMsgMIHKOj1SCtpt9E=
|
| 35 |
=agXf
|
| 36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives