| 1 |
Am 28.10.2009 19:57, schrieb Alan McKinnon: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 28 October 2009 20:44:59 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 |
>>> That kind of delivery limits the access to this mails to the local |
| 4 |
>>> maschine. If I want to read local I don't need mails, I could just read |
| 5 |
>>> the logfiles from portage in /var/log/ |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> But I am aware that solving this problem is nothing that portage has to |
| 8 |
>>> do, as it is no problem with portage at all. |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> My mail was just to show that not everyone has a local mailserver |
| 11 |
>>> running on his maschine. |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> Greetings |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> Sebastian |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> then let it store everything as elog and read that with elogv. |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> mail is just an additional bonus feature. |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> His initial mail said that he would like a copy of elogs to go to his inbox at |
| 24 |
> his ISP. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
NO.. As I am NOT Grant I don't said that. |
| 27 |
My Mail was more a reply to Volker Armin Hemmann to show that not |
| 28 |
everyone has a local mailserver running (what Volker implied) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> Later mails imply he might want to read them over IMAP so they are |
| 31 |
> accessible at multiple locations. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Yes, that would be great. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
> Have you looked at ssmtp? Very light, very small and you can protect your |
| 36 |
> login password with Unix file permissions instead of leaving them open in |
| 37 |
> make.conf |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
That sounds great, I absolutly going to look at it. Thanks for the tip, |
| 40 |
maybe that is something for Grant too. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Greetings |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Sebastian |
Archives