| 1 |
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 20:44:59 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 2 |
> > That kind of delivery limits the access to this mails to the local |
| 3 |
> > maschine. If I want to read local I don't need mails, I could just read |
| 4 |
> > the logfiles from portage in /var/log/ |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > But I am aware that solving this problem is nothing that portage has to |
| 7 |
> > do, as it is no problem with portage at all. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > My mail was just to show that not everyone has a local mailserver |
| 10 |
> > running on his maschine. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Greetings |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Sebastian |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> then let it store everything as elog and read that with elogv. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> mail is just an additional bonus feature. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
His initial mail said that he would like a copy of elogs to go to his inbox at |
| 23 |
his ISP. Later mails imply he might want to read them over IMAP so they are |
| 24 |
accessible at multiple locations. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Sebastian, |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Have you looked at ssmtp? Very light, very small and you can protect your |
| 29 |
login password with Unix file permissions instead of leaving them open in |
| 30 |
make.conf |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives