1 |
On Thursday, July 21 at 18:43 (-0700), Grant said: |
2 |
|
3 |
> If I understand correctly, an out-of-memory condition that would lock |
4 |
> up a system without swap, will cause it to thrash with swap. A remote |
5 |
> system of mine was locked up for many hours due to running out of |
6 |
> memory without swap. If I had enabled swap, the system would have |
7 |
> thrashed for those hours? |
8 |
|
9 |
It really depends. The rule of thumb is, if your disk is thrashing or |
10 |
you are getting ooms/locks then you need more RAM (or less memory-hungry |
11 |
processes). |