1 |
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 10:09 -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 13:05 +0100, Matthias Langer wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 22:49 -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote: |
4 |
> > > I think I've somehow managed to screw gcc up. Whenever I try to emerge |
5 |
> > > anything I get this message: |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler |
8 |
> > > cannot create executables |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > It also says "See config.log for details", but I can't find config.log - |
11 |
> > > it doesn't give a full path. Is there a way to repair this without |
12 |
> > > having to completely reinstall Gentoo? |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > I've had this problem too some time ago - however, i'm not sure how i |
16 |
> > solved it - but i think it was something with fix-libtool.sh or |
17 |
> > gcc-config. Try to compile a simple c-program by hand - maybe this will |
18 |
> > give you some hints about the source of your problem. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Matthias |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I created a simple "Hello World" program in C and tried to compile it |
24 |
> using gcc: |
25 |
> |
26 |
> camille ~ # gcc hello.c |
27 |
> gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `as': No such file or directory |
28 |
|
29 |
I ran "equery belongs as" and one of the packages that contains that |
30 |
program was binutils. I checked the location the the program and it |
31 |
indeed did not exist which supports my theory. Is there a way to |
32 |
rebuild binutils without using gcc? |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |