| 1 |
On Tue, 27 May 2008 10:52:14 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michal 'vorner' Vaner <vorner@×××.cz> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hello |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 08:28:27AM +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote: |
| 7 |
> > Bottom line: I see no reason for signing messages to MLs like this |
| 8 |
> > one. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The point is, there is no point _not_ signing them too. And when you |
| 11 |
> configure your mail client to sign anything you send... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Ah! That's a whole different story. There's no harm in signing and |
| 15 |
switching "auto sign every msg on/off" or something alike can be |
| 16 |
annoying. I agree completely. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
Daniel |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives