| 1 |
Hello |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 08:28:27AM +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote: |
| 4 |
> Bottom line: I see no reason for signing messages to MLs like this one. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
The point is, there is no point _not_ signing them too. And when you |
| 7 |
configure your mail client to sign anything you send (and it is IMO good |
| 8 |
habit to do so, you sign papermail too, by some means), it makes you |
| 9 |
trouble, when they do not accept signed (only anonymous) messages |
| 10 |
somewhere. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
I've already told you more than I know. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Michal 'vorner' Vaner |
Archives