Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: felix@×××××××.com
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:15:02
Message-Id: 20070606215938.GA20041@crowfix.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid by "b.n."
1 Complaining TWICE worked. The problem I complained about shouldn't
2 have happened in the first place; someonex fixed something that wasn't
3 broken and made it broken.
4
5 Your response is absolutely typical of my problem with the gentoo dev
6 community. You misstate a complaint, overreact to it, and apparently
7 feel pretty smug about your accomplishment. No one will admit to the
8 two screwups (first breaking a working ebuild, second incorrectly
9 closing a bug on it). Instead you lash out at those who point out
10 problems.
11
12 Yes, I had the wrong program when I compalined about the color
13 problem. But the gentoo community response then as now was to lash
14 out, scream and shout, not to actually investigate. And when I
15 finally left the thread alone, you geniuses were still ranting about
16 it three days later when I next checked.
17
18 You folks may think you have a cool system, and it is in some ways and
19 could be in many others. But I know many people who tried gentoo and
20 bailed precisely because of the shoot the messenger mentality so
21 pervasive here; the self-selected sample you see is meaningless.
22
23 Go ahead, have another three days' fun. Maybe I'll spark some more
24 tinders in a month or two. I wouldn't want to deprive you of your
25 fun.
26
27 --
28 ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
29 Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@×××××××.com
30 GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
31 I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
32 --
33 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Again: Critical bugs considered invalid "b.n." <brullonulla@×××××.com>