From: | "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default? | ||
Date: | Tue, 12 Jul 2016 22:09:52 | ||
Message-Id: | 20160712170928.7d34d4b7@sepulchrave.remarqs | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default? by R0b0t1 |
1 | On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:14:57 -0500 |
2 | R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > Pale Moon is routinely behind Firefox on security fixes (actual fixes, |
5 | > not wanking-in-a-corner fixes). |
6 | |
7 | Is anyone other than the Pale Moon team itself trying to track its |
8 | vulnerabilities? I could only find one CVE for it, from 2013. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is "-fomit-frame-pointer" a gcc default? | waltdnes@××××××××.org |