1 |
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:21 AM, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> gottlieb@×××.edu wrote: |
3 |
>>On Thu, Aug 29 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:19 PM, <gottlieb@×××.edu> wrote: |
6 |
>>>> |
7 |
>>>> I have experience with LVM, but not systemd or dracut or initramfs |
8 |
>>>> |
9 |
>>>> * both grub and grub2 support lvm |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> Does GRUB legacy handles /boot in LVM? I haven't tried that yet. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>>That I don't know. I believe the LVM "companion manual" that I am |
14 |
>>seeking and that I used for previous installs advised against /boot on |
15 |
>>lvm (probably also /lib and others). Perhaps this was simply |
16 |
>>reflecting |
17 |
>>no initramfs. Hence any grub issue with /boot on lvm didn't arise. |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>>allan |
20 |
> |
21 |
> No. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Grub legacy does not support LVM for the /boot. |
24 |
> That's why I have it there. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> UEFI only understands FAT. Which means you need to have a boot partition |
27 |
> outside of LVM for that. |
28 |
|
29 |
Good to know, thanks. Another reason not to use LVM I guess. |
30 |
|
31 |
Regards. |
32 |
-- |
33 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
34 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
35 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |