| 1 |
David Leverton ha scritto: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 17 September 2008 00:27:54 b.n. wrote: |
| 3 |
>> If he *knew* it was idiotic, he *would not* have done it, isn't it? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> That's his problem. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
No, that's *your* problem now, because you and your accolites now look |
| 8 |
like a bunch of arrogant a**holes, instead of helpful people. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
You did a wonderfully awful PR job. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
If your aim is Paludis success or even thriving, you are failing in one |
| 13 |
of the most ridicolous ways possible. |
| 14 |
(And if your aim is not Paludis success, why do you care about people |
| 15 |
spreading "lies" on that project?) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
>> Until I will see anti-paludis campaigns in the streets, sorry, it's just |
| 18 |
>> paranoia. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> That seems like a rather arbitrary restriction. As you said, most people in |
| 21 |
> the world don't care about anything Gentoo-related, so campaigning in the |
| 22 |
> streets seems rather unlikely, |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
That was of course an hyperbole. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I asked instead seriously for facts about such "campaign". URLs of |
| 27 |
websites dedicated against Paludis, menacing mails, personal attacks, |
| 28 |
whatever. I am still waiting for evidence of this mysterious conspiracy. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> but that's no excuse for spreading lies |
| 31 |
> amongst the subset of people who do care. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
I will believe these are lies when I will see facts backing your |
| 34 |
assertions. Until that, I am neutral on both sides. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
>> And, sir, what would the aim of those people be? What advantage they |
| 37 |
>> have from maliciously and viciously crushing Paludis? Will they become |
| 38 |
>> richer? More powerful? Or it's for the women? |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> My theory is that they're scared. Or it could just be because they enjoy |
| 41 |
> hurting other people. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Scared of what? Of you? My theory is that you have no clue: and that's |
| 44 |
obvious, since you can't rationalize fully what is simply a reassuring |
| 45 |
delusion. |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
>> And you are not doing that. Trying to win on Volker, you are losing with |
| 48 |
>> everyone else. |
| 49 |
> |
| 50 |
> Only the irrational ones. |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
And if you care only about rational ones, well: |
| 53 |
- if these are lies, rational people will look at facts for themselves |
| 54 |
and will stay on the rational side. So why caring at Volker's lies? |
| 55 |
- irrational people will believe to lies, but you don't care of |
| 56 |
irrational people, so, why bothering again? |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
So, how is you are rational? |
Archives