| 1 |
On 08/19/2015 09:05 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Anything you can do without the kernel source code is legal, sure. But |
| 5 |
>> we're talking about... |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> 1. Downloading the kernel source (making a copy of) it. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> You're receiving a copy of it. You don't need a license to download |
| 10 |
> something. You'll notice that even the RIAA doesn't sue people who |
| 11 |
> download music - they sue people who UPLOAD it. They are on far more |
| 12 |
> solid legal ground doing the latter. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Uhhhhhhhhhh |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Please cite a law that says you're not allowed to receive a copy of a |
| 20 |
> copyrighted work without a license. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
ยง 106 . Exclusive rights in copyrighted works |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this |
| 25 |
title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
(1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies |
Archives