Archives
Archives
| From: | lee <lee@××××××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: repos.conf migration lost overlay priority | ||
| Date: | Sun, 22 Feb 2015 15:25:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | 87zj86mblb.fsf@heimdali.yagibdah.de | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: repos.conf migration lost overlay priority by Nikos Chantziaras |
||
| 1 | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > On a side note, someone should inform the portage devs that higher |
| 4 | > priorities should equal lower numbers. Don't do it the opposite way to |
| 5 | > the rest of the world, please :-P |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Why should "low" mean "high"? The rest of the world usually considers |
| 8 | "high" as high and "low" as low. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Again we must be afraid of speaking of daemons for fear that daemons |
| 13 | might swallow us. Finally, this fear has become reasonable. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: repos.conf migration lost overlay priority | Daniel Frey <djqfrey@×××××.com> |