Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Daniel Frey <djqfrey@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: repos.conf migration lost overlay priority
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 16:11:54
Message-Id: 54E9FFBE.8040003@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: repos.conf migration lost overlay priority by lee
1 On 02/22/2015 03:26 AM, lee wrote:
2 > Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> writes:
3 >
4 >> On a side note, someone should inform the portage devs that higher
5 >> priorities should equal lower numbers. Don't do it the opposite way to
6 >> the rest of the world, please :-P
7 >
8 > Why should "low" mean "high"? The rest of the world usually considers
9 > "high" as high and "low" as low.
10 >
11 >
12
13 That's not how the real world deals with priority lists. If I have
14 something urgent and I tell someone it's priority 10 they'll tell me to
15 I'll have to deal with it faster than that.
16
17 1=First thing to do
18 2=Second thing to do
19 etc...
20
21 Dan