| 1 |
Am 19.12.2016 um 10:59 schrieb Neil Bothwick: |
| 2 |
> If you can't work that out for yourself, what are you doing running |
| 3 |
> Gentoo. I'm stating it can be done, I have neither the time nor the |
| 4 |
> inclination to document it. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
The question is not, if I can work this out myself or not. The question |
| 7 |
is: Can you prove what you're claiming? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> I never claimed it was reasonable, you asked for a way to read them if |
| 10 |
> you don't have systemd installed and I suggested a way. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I didn't ask. I've proven that those binary log files are crap, because |
| 13 |
not they are not - say - compatible or interchangeable or whatever to |
| 14 |
normal POSIX systems like the text files are. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
The commands cat, less, grep are on every UNIX/Linux system. This |
| 17 |
systemd logreader (I've forgotten its name) is not. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> But if you intend to dismiss anyone with a standpoint that does not |
| 20 |
> precisely align with yours as a fanboy, there is no point in continuing |
| 21 |
> this discussion. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
It's just that you gave the same silly arguments every Poettering fanboy |
| 24 |
gives in such discussions. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> Excellent, adding distortion to the ad hominem insults. I was simply |
| 27 |
> pointing out that systemd does not preclude the use of an alternative |
| 28 |
> logger. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Just twist it as you need it. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> Why? Because you demand so? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Because the Poettering fanboys and you always say so. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Heiko Baums |
Archives