From: | Holger Hoffstaette <holger.hoffstaette@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)? | ||
Date: | Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:06:58 | ||
Message-Id: | pan.2011.11.12.17.05.36.1848@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] The LIGHTEST web server (just for serving files)? by Florian Philipp |
1 | On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:14:33 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > Disadvantages? I'm unsure how portage will handle cases when two |
4 | > machines fetch the same file at the same time. |
5 | |
6 | In my experience concurrent/overlapping fetches work just fine, thanks to |
7 | portage's lock file. The second potential downloader just waits or does |
8 | something else in the meantime. |
9 | |
10 | -h |