1 |
On Sat 25 Feb 2012 05:48:49 PM IST, Mick wrote: |
2 |
> On Saturday 25 Feb 2012 02:32:49 Pandu Poluan wrote: |
3 |
>> On Feb 25, 2012 9:14 AM, "Grant" <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>>>>> I need to test a kernel config change on a remote system. Is there a |
5 |
>>>>> safe way to do this? The fallback thing in grub has never worked for |
6 |
>>>>> me. When does that ever work? |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> You can press ESC in the Grub screen and it will take you to text-only |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> mode. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>>>> There, you select an entry, press "e" and edit it. Press ENTER when |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> you're |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>>>> finished, and then press "b" to boot your modified entry. |
17 |
>>>> |
18 |
>>>> That way, you can boot whatever kernel you want if the current one |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> doesn't |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>>>> work. |
23 |
>>> |
24 |
>>> I can't do that remotely though. I'm probably asking for something |
25 |
>>> that doesn't exist. |
26 |
>>> |
27 |
>>> - Grant |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> Situations like these that made me decide with great conviction to always |
30 |
>> deploy my servers virtualized, even if the box in question will only host a |
31 |
>> single VM. |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> Now, if I lost my intelligence for a couple of seconds and somehow ended up |
34 |
>> with a VM that's no longer accessible remotely, I just connect to the |
35 |
>> virtual console. |
36 |
>> |
37 |
>> The flip side? Now I'm getting too daring/careless, and the uptime now |
38 |
>> drops below my (self-imposed) target of 99.99% :-P |
39 |
> |
40 |
> What do you do when you need to upgrade the host, rather than the guest? |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
I think setting up a VM on the server using the new kernel should help |
44 |
test a new kernel? |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
Nilesh Govindarajan |
48 |
http://nileshgr.com |