| 1 |
Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 22:41:26 +0800, Kerwin Hui wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> If it is updates, I do this: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> emerge --resume -p | genlop -p |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Any reason why genlop instead of qlop (app-portage/portage-utils)? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Last time I looked, qlop did not provide any estimate of time remaining. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That will teach me to take a nap. That's why I use genlop too. I |
| 17 |
rarely use any of the q commands. It seems something is always missing |
| 18 |
for one reason or the other. I'm sure that varies over time tho. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I'm just disappointed that genlop fails if it runs into a package that |
| 21 |
has not been compiled before. It offers a option to go to a website and |
| 22 |
estimate the time from that but thing is, no one has my CPU so that |
| 23 |
errors out too. I wish they would put it back like it was and if a |
| 24 |
person wants to use the option to check a website, fine, they can do |
| 25 |
that. In the meantime, I get something besides a error message and no |
| 26 |
info at all. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Progress is sometimes no progress at all. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Dale |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
:-) :-) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
| 36 |
how you interpreted my words! |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
| 39 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |
Archives