1 |
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 10:37:53 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Is this an officially approved technique?? it is DIRTY. |
4 |
|
5 |
If the change doesn't affect the installed code, it is encouraged to |
6 |
avoid unnecessary rebuilding. |
7 |
|
8 |
For example, a new version of LibreOffice or Chromium depends on libfoo, |
9 |
but the dev doesn't notice and already has libfoo installed so it works |
10 |
for him. You also have it installed so the upgrade works for you, then it |
11 |
fails for me and I file a bug report. If the dev revbumped the ebuild, |
12 |
you would have to spend a couple of hours rebuilding Chromium to get |
13 |
exactly the same code you had before. By not revbumping it, he fixes the |
14 |
problem for me without inconveniencing you. |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Neil Bothwick |
19 |
|
20 |
System halted - Press all keys at once to continue. |