| 1 |
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:17:23 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Sorry, that's what I meant. I was thinking that unmerging a set was |
| 4 |
> > like unmerging a meta-package, that only the set itself would go. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Ah, okay, we meant the same thing then. :) AFAK emerge -C @set will |
| 7 |
> remove everything in @set but there's no portage command to remove the |
| 8 |
> set definition without unmerging what's in it. I could be wrong on |
| 9 |
> that, though. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
You're wrong about that because you're right - I was wrong. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
This man is depriving a village somewhere of an idiot |
Archives