Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Ryan Viljoen <ravilj@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Improving SpamAssassin's accuracy...
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:44:51
Message-Id: deb20110601151133q2a381d14s1f97af40c2e1db9e@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Improving SpamAssassin's accuracy... by Stroller
1 > > What I landed up doing is defining a set of my own rules that detected
2 > > if penis, viagra, slut and such words occured it added a +10.0 to the
3 > > spam assassin rating so if is clearly identified as spam.
4 >
5 > I'm somewhat cautious about this. I know you get very high hit rates
6 > with this, but it doesn't make any allowances for false positives -
7 > if I make a list of "banned words" like this, one of them is _sure_
8 > to turn up one day.
9
10 Yeah I have this enabled in a school environment and the majority of
11 the words I have in the list either way are not suitable for a school
12 environment.
13
14 > I don't plan to dump the detected spam to /dev/null, but to a
15 > separate folder (SpamAssassin is already doing this nicely with the %
16 > age it detects) but my suspicion is that users will probably never
17 > check that Junk folder once they find it rarely contains anything of
18 > interest.
19
20 Again some kids dont check their mail and dont bother to maintain
21 their inbox so putting the spam in a seperate folder would just allow
22 it to accumulate.
23 --
24
25 Ryan Viljoen Bsc(Eng) (Electrical)
26
27 "Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable."
28 - Mark Twain
29
30 --
31 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Improving SpamAssassin's accuracy... Uwe Thiem <uwix@××××.na>