| 1 |
On 15 Jan 2006, at 10:15, Ryan Viljoen wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> What I landed up doing is defining a set of my own rules that detected |
| 4 |
> if penis, viagra, slut and such words occured it added a +10.0 to the |
| 5 |
> spam assassin rating so if is clearly identified as spam. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I'm somewhat cautious about this. I know you get very high hit rates |
| 8 |
with this, but it doesn't make any allowances for false positives - |
| 9 |
if I make a list of "banned words" like this, one of them is _sure_ |
| 10 |
to turn up one day. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I don't plan to dump the detected spam to /dev/null, but to a |
| 13 |
separate folder (SpamAssassin is already doing this nicely with the % |
| 14 |
age it detects) but my suspicion is that users will probably never |
| 15 |
check that Junk folder once they find it rarely contains anything of |
| 16 |
interest. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Stroller. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives