| 1 |
On Jan 15, 2006, at 7:59 AM, Stroller wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On 15 Jan 2006, at 10:15, Ryan Viljoen wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> What I landed up doing is defining a set of my own rules that |
| 7 |
>> detected |
| 8 |
>> if penis, viagra, slut and such words occured it added a +10.0 to the |
| 9 |
>> spam assassin rating so if is clearly identified as spam. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
This is exactly what the navy did while my wife was in it. |
| 12 |
Unfortunately, my wife is a pediatrician, and so has quite a bit of |
| 13 |
legitimate email with many of those words in it. Be careful of your |
| 14 |
userbase demographics when setting up things like this. |
| 15 |
> I'm somewhat cautious about this. I know you get very high hit |
| 16 |
> rates with this, but it doesn't make any allowances for false |
| 17 |
> positives - if I make a list of "banned words" like this, one of |
| 18 |
> them is _sure_ to turn up one day. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I don't plan to dump the detected spam to /dev/null, but to a |
| 21 |
> separate folder (SpamAssassin is already doing this nicely with the |
| 22 |
> %age it detects) but my suspicion is that users will probably never |
| 23 |
> check that Junk folder once they find it rarely contains anything |
| 24 |
> of interest. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Stroller. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> -- |
| 29 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives