1 |
On Sunday 22 Mar 2015 09:37:19 Julian Simioni wrote: |
2 |
> Interesting. When I used IMAP in Mutt, rather than offlineimap, I was |
3 |
> really frustrated by the constant lag within Mutt from syncing with the |
4 |
> server. |
5 |
|
6 |
I experienced the same problem, but this was more pronounced on IMAP accounts |
7 |
with many thousands of email messages (more than 100,000). That said, Kmail2 |
8 |
has the same problem, only on less powerful machines you also get the lag of |
9 |
mysql indexing everything again and again and again. Accounts with fewer |
10 |
messages were quite responsive on both mutt and Kmail2. Therefore I think |
11 |
that this may be an IMAP4 issue? |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
> Offlineimap isn't the fastest ever at syncing either, but at |
15 |
> least it happens all in one go, and then the full contents of all the |
16 |
> emails I care about are on my local machine. I'd love to see your config |
17 |
> to see if I can improve things. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Julian |
20 |
|
21 |
I never used Offlineimap, but did try tokyocabinet with what felt as a |
22 |
marginal only improvement. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
PS. Top-posting messes up threaded answers and logical flow of responses ... |
26 |
please refrain from using it on this mailing list. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Regards, |
30 |
Mick |