1 |
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:37:08 +0100, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:40:37 +0100, Zeerak Waseem wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
>> True, but even those using Openbox, icewm, etc. were introduced to the |
7 |
>> mess that HAL is, and also to dbus. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> You're trying to assign guilt by association. They were also introduced |
10 |
> to X, hand edited conf files and a faster desktop. Are they all bad too? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
Yes! :p |
14 |
|
15 |
I'm not saying dbus is all that bad, just that it might be a bit |
16 |
unnecessary for a number of users. Which to me means, that it should be |
17 |
something that can be chosen, rather than something that's chosen for you. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Zeerak |