| 1 |
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:47:39 +0100, Zeerak Waseem wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I'm not saying dbus is all that bad, just that it might be a bit |
| 4 |
> unnecessary for a number of users. Which to me means, that it should |
| 5 |
> be something that can be chosen, rather than something that's chosen |
| 6 |
> for you. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
It's not there for the users, it's there for the software. How much better |
| 9 |
would that software be if the developers spent half their time writing |
| 10 |
code to communicate, write to logs and all the other standard tasks. Next |
| 11 |
you'll suggest that filesystems should be optional because the apps can |
| 12 |
always work out which disk blocks to use by themselves. Don't get me |
| 13 |
started on compilers, what a bloated waste of resources when apps could |
| 14 |
be written in hand crafted assembly. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Neil Bothwick |
Archives