| 1 |
Jarry wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> after updating baselayout from 2.0.3 to 2.1-r1 /run is mounted |
| 5 |
> as tmpfs. But I can not find any mount-option for controlling |
| 6 |
> how much memory is (or could be) used for it. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on |
| 9 |
> tmpfs 8223848 224 8223624 1% /run |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I know it does not use 8GB right now, yet I'd like to reduce |
| 12 |
> it to some lower value, not half of my physical memory. |
| 13 |
> How can I do it? Can I simply add line in fstab like: |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> none /run tmpfs size=128m 0 0 ??? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Jarry |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Holy smoke ! Mine is doing the same thing. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
tmpfs 7.9G 260K 7.9G 1% /run |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
But I also have this: |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
tmpfs 7.9G 0 7.9G 0% /var/tmp/portage |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
So, between those two, I could run out of ram since I have 16Gbs. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
There is now TWO people that needs a answer to this question. Why does |
| 31 |
it need that much anyway? It looks to me like a few hundred Mbs, like |
| 32 |
Jarry posted, would be plenty. Jeepers creepers. lol |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Dale |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
:-) :-) |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
| 40 |
how you interpreted my words! |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
| 43 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |
Archives