| 1 |
· Thomas T. Veldhouse <veldy@×××××.net>: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> How is it that the baselayout has changed and now the domainname script |
| 4 |
> is missing from /etc/init.d and all sorts of other ramifications because |
| 5 |
> of this? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
"this" == you, not configuring the system? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> It makes very little sense to ditch the unix norm of setting a |
| 10 |
> systemwide domain name in favor of doing it per interface! |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
True. And that's probably why you don't *have* to set it per interface. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
But I agree, it makes no sense to even be able to set this per interface. |
| 15 |
At least I don't see how or when this could be useful and how this should |
| 16 |
work. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> Now I see |
| 19 |
> that I have to set domainname in /etc/conf.d/net and that the domainname |
| 20 |
> program returns "(none)". A lot of software is affected by this |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
By "what"? By a misconfigured system? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Alexander Skwar, who also was quite surprised when the domainname |
| 25 |
configuration moved to /etc/conf.d/net. |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
The eternal feminine draws us upward. |
| 28 |
-- Goethe |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives