1 |
covici@××××××××××.com wrote: |
2 |
> Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> covici@××××××××××.com wrote: |
5 |
>>> Mick<michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>>> On Saturday 26 Nov 2011 15:22:15 Michael Mol wrote: |
8 |
>>>>> I just wanted to share an experience I had today with optimizing parallel |
9 |
>>>>> builds after discovering "-l" for Make... |
10 |
>>>>> |
11 |
>>>>> I've got a little more tweaking I still want to do, but this is pretty |
12 |
>>>>> awesome... |
13 |
>>>>> |
14 |
>>>>> http://funnybutnot.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/optimizing-parallel-builds/ |
15 |
>>>>> |
16 |
>>>>> ZZ |
17 |
>>>> Thanks for sharing! How do you determine the optimum value for -l? |
18 |
>>> How do you get emerge not to display number of jobs and load average -- |
19 |
>>> I only want to compile one at a time -- much safer that way and it is |
20 |
>>> doing that, but now it displays all that load average and how many jobs, |
21 |
>>> etc. -- any way to get rid of that display? |
22 |
>>> |
23 |
>> Thank Zac for that. He thinks he knows what you want. ;-) |
24 |
>> Apparently not huh? |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-901858.html |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> Just add --quiet-build=n to EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS in make.conf and it |
29 |
>> will do it the old way. |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> Hope that helps. |
32 |
> Thanks much. Don't these people have anything to do -- like fix ebuild |
33 |
> bugs? Very strange indeed. |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
Well, they had the poll but the dev thinks he knows better. So, this is |
37 |
Gentoo and the devs rule the roost here. It's pretty much been that way |
38 |
since I started using Gentoo back in 2003. I don't expect it to change |
39 |
and you shouldn't either. ;-) Just do like I do, when they change |
40 |
something, override it with your own setting. It works for me. |
41 |
|
42 |
Dale |
43 |
|
44 |
:-) :-) |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |